Through generations of society we’ve had the great privilege of the profound and remarkable words of William Shakespeare. He’s been a historian of sorts. A poet destined for humanity. And a writer rightfully touted as masterful.
However, Roland Emmerich’s newest endeavor, Anonymous, is the theory that Shakespeare was a peasant – a mere illiterate and incompetent actor who took the credit for Edward De Vere’s work.
While the premise is intriguing, the plot is construed in the most insulting demeanor. Screenwriter John Orloff contrives every plotline to swiftly shift his view in a more appealing and compelling light. His fallacies include bending history to make statements on infidelity and loyalties appear more significant – characters suffered to prove some lofty theory that can be disproved within minutes.
The actors do what they can with the material – all-turning in competent performances. Among the golden British cast, Rhys Ifans delivering a heartbreaking performance as De Vere and Vanessa Redgrave excellent as Queen Elizabeth, stand above the crowd.
Sebastian Armesto, a newcomer in Hollywood, is also quite good. He plays Ben Jonson, the writer of the preface of the anthology of Shakespeare’s work and (in the film at least) the man who brought all the plays De Vere wrote to the incompetent William Shakespeare.
For those in need of explanation of why De Vere gave his work to Jonson to ultimately hand down to William… It is because De Vere was the Earl of Oxford and his place in society did not permit him to indulge in literary arts.
Beyond the tour-de-force of acting the only detail that could be considered “quality” would be its cinematography. Completed by Anna Foerster it encapsulates the time period imminently and authentically.
Albeit its attributes, Anonymous comes off as a long-winded, dreary, and deplorable little picture – juxtaposed with unrelated anecdotes, history that requires a perquisite before heading in, and some twisty incest plotline that’s equal measures baffling and discomforting.
To no surprise, Emmerich has directed subsequent dreadful films – 2012, Independence Day, and Day After Tomorrow. All of which are ludicrous pictures in massive proportions. Anonymous, over the straggling test of time, will fit right in.
The storyteller, supposedly there to assist and guide you on a journey, does nothing but perplex each and every situation. The only problem is, it’s not all that entertaining. The rollercoaster ride ultimately morphs into one big, sparse slog, jumbled into an incoherent and pervasive mess.
If the director’s object is to represent an outlandish injustice that occurred, he fails… quite miserably.
What I took away is that though the Edward De Vere was frowned upon by the Kingdom for neglecting his prosperous property and his royal wife, we were left with a man who, unlike any other in the history of mankind, brought insight into an entire generation (I come about this by just going with the film’s theory).
William Shakespeare’s fables, poems, sonnets, and all things literary, withstand today because of the contemporariness of his stories. Love is forever an endless struggle. Loyalty is always scarce. And hardships between families – from the wealthy to the poor – will never cease to exist.
Shakespeare, whoever it may be, brought us more than words. He brought life.
We will forever be thankful in that regard.
Still, it’s a shame the agenda of the director overrides the pictures artistic integrity. What should dwell into a theory about a man who wrote beautiful plays, but had to hand it down to one less renowned in society, merely thrives on distasteful and pompous tones.
The final product comes off as something along the lines of the British don’t want to accept that William Shakespeare was not some grand aristocrat but was in fact a standard, humane citizen (gasp!).
At the end of the day, there’s no real upside to Anonymous. Those who are unfamiliar with Shakespeare will be repetitively bored and those who are adequate with the subject will be repulsed by the obnoxious theory at hand.
Just a bit of a disclaimer, a recent article by James Shapiro of The New York Times reminisces over just a few of the gaping, historical flaws in the film. One most importantly, Edwards De Vere (the Earl of Oxford) died in 1604 – years before 10 to 15 plays of Shakespeare were ever written.
Rating: 



Anonymous (2011)
Cast: Rhys Ifans, Vanessa Redgrave, Sebastián Fernández-Armesto
Director: Roland Emmerich
Writer: John Orloff
Runtime: 130 minutes
Genre: thriller, drama




The film had its fair share of flaws but Emmerich really keeps this film moving with a story that is detailed with great mystery to it, and shows his love for Shakespeare’s writing very well. Let’s just hope he sticks away from blowing up the world the now. Good review Sam.
Thanks for reading Dan.
I think your disclaimer more than encapsulates all that is wrong with Roland Emmerich’s films. It also highlights a key reason why historical films need to at least try and get their facts right, or make their conspiracy theories a lot more believable.
Great review, Sam, once again. While you’ve slammed the film pretty hard here, I’m still gonna watch it on DVD or something later on – just so I can agree with you.
I believe it makes some effort to be historically correct … At least for the first ten minutes.
first ten minutes? God, it sounds like the only thing accurate about this film are the opening and closing credits…..
The opening and closing credits are pitiful. A historian in the modern age speaking in such a didactic demeanor.
Hmmm.
i thought this may have been OK. I met Emmerich recently at an event and he was so enthusiastic about this film I thought it may have paid off. Shame
Great review matey!!
How was meeting Emmerich – because though I don’t like his films, I’m fascinated by the guy….
Nice review. I’m usually game for conspiracy theories, but the trailer for this one didn’t really call to me.
Although I would take issue with calling Independence Day a dreadful film. It’s one that I end up watching over and over whenever it’s on tv.
It’s not very good my friend
Spot on my friend. I can’t disagree with any of this. Your last paragraph sums it up. This is a film that will please very few people. It is far less accessible than his other works, but granted, much more complex. Too complex in fact. That 130 minutes felt like five hours. So many time shifts and characters. It took me ages to work out who was who – and there was no real mystery behind the story. We are told exactly as the theory suggests – and then given a bunch of other scandals and dramatic turns (illegitimate sons, incest and the battle for the throne) to draw things out and make them complicated. I think the moral struggle of Ben Jonson (a writer who de Vere shared all of his secrets with, and was idolised by, but also the subject of jealousy) would have been really interesting. But that’s given no weight. I had low expectations, and the tech work was better than I expected (quite good). As was some of the acting. The story is nothing short of repulsive.
Haha five hours… Maybe three
All of the acting, so I found, was very impressive.
Thanks for confirming my fears about this film, so I don’t have to go see it. However, I will have to hear students who only saw the preview tell me with absolute certainty that someone else wrote Shakespeare’s plays. Aargh!
What school are you working at now in days?
So odd that Emmerich is the guy to give us this movie. Pretty to look at, difficult to follow and but still it’s an interesting “what if?”. Too bad this was just so bogged down by its own pretentiousness and attempts to be a serious period piece. Oh well credit for him trying something completely out of his comfort zone right?
I’ll give him credit for that. I liked this comment on Anonamlous Material as well …. my review there as well
Just wasn’t sure which outlet you’d check first:P Wanted my bases covered is all XD
[...] Duke & The MoviesThe Critical Movie Critics [...]